Perspective's role in Home Fire

    One of the central themes I have been tracking as I read Shamsie's Home Fire is the question of assimilation or conforming. Perspective helps illuminate this argument, with Shamsie not taking a particular side, instead allowing the characters to share their own perspective to provide the reader with the various answers to the question of immigration and culture. Thus far, we have seen two very different responses to the pressure British Muslims face. 

    Isma being the first character introduced, is fairly neutral in opinion. She despises Karamat Lone, feeling very much that he is a traitor, while simultaneously understanding that assimilation is an unfortunate necessity, like when she is interrogated in the airport. Eamonn, the next character, twists our idea of Karamat Lone. Assimilation, from Eamonn's perspective, is not abandoning your people, but a necessary part of keeping up with society's standards. He describes Islam as a "cancer" and does not practice the religion. Parvaiz's section presents an entirely new solution to the pressure to assimilate. Farooq and the militant group he represents are opposed to existing in the western world entirely, figuring that any society that discriminates and commits violence against his people deserves to be fought. Aneeka is also totally opposed to assimilation, believing that Muslims should be free to exist in western society without persecution. 

    Shamsie's use of perspective ties into the central argument of the story. At this point in the story, the book has presented an issue and allowed the reader to see both sides without bias. The order serves to introduce the reader first to the whole argument (Isma's perpective) before transitioning to more extreme opinions (Aneeka, Eamonn, and Parvaiz's perspectives). 

Comments

  1. HeatherLOctober 1, 2022 at 2:55 PM

    Hey Jalen! I really enjoyed hearing your thoughts about the role of assimilation in Home Fire. I feel like sometimes the world tries to categorize groups like Muslims together and paint them as all feeling the same way about certain issues, when in reality there is a significant scope and depth of opinions. As we move onto the final couple sections of the novel, I will be sure to pay attention to what the narrator's perspective tells us about their desire (or lack of desire) to assimilate!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Critical Thinkers and WritersOctober 3, 2022 at 3:08 PM

    Have these various perspectives affected your own views on this topic so far?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Jalen PaigeOctober 8, 2022 at 4:49 PM

      I do think Parvaiz's perspective has made me more sympathetic towards people like him who feel out of place in their own home. He is more of a victim of a system that does not support him than he is a terrorist.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Week 10: Pachinko, Identity, and Family

     Pachinko  is a book so jam-packed with meaning and depth that it would be hard to say everything there is to say about the book in one blog post. The story is a deep examination of identity and belonging- something we've seen in a lot of the more contemporary texts in this class. Pachinko 's wide variety of characters all struggle to feel in place in a society catered towards heterosexual Japanese men. It almost feels cynical in this way, with Solomon and Noa returning to pachinko after working so hard to get an education and move up the social ladder. I think it could be argued that this sort of acceptance, the kind gained from working hard enough to become a model minority, is not the way to find belonging. Family is key here. Society is a hard thing to find belonging in, especially when you exist outside of the accepted and typical behaviors and identities within it. But family is a constant. When society doesn't accept us, our family often does. Noa's happie...
Read more

Week 8: Biblical References

     Pachinko has a lot of biblical references in terms of characters names (which may or not be obvious depending on how familiar you are with the bible). Characters share names with biblical figures whom they share a lot with.     Isak, for example, is very similar to Isaac from the Bible. Abraham, one of the most important patriarchal figures in both Christianity and Judaism, is the father of Isaac. Abraham and his wife have Isaac when they are both very old, as a gift from God, which they are incredibly grateful for. However, God asks Abraham to sacrifice Isaac to him, similar to how people from that time may have sacrificed an animal. Abraham is reluctant, but decides to goes through with it. Right before sacrificing his son, an angel stops Abraham. In this sense, Isak and Isaac have a lot in common. Both are 'sacrifices'- Isaac literally and Isak in terms of his selflessness in general and specifically to Sunja.      Noa is clearly a referen...
Read more

Week 3: Smasher Sullivan

     In "The Secret River" by Kate Grenville, the character of Smasher Sullivan stands out as a powerful representation of the violence and brutality inflicted upon the Indigenous people by white settlers during the colonial period. He definitely shocked me as I read the novel.      From his introduction, where he brags about hanging an Indigenous person, to the end of the novel, Smasher's character is fairly static, showing little to no mercy for the people he encounters. However, one of the most disturbing aspects of Smasher's character is his dehumanization of the Indigenous people. He views them as obstacles and issues to be dealt with, rather than as human beings. This dehumanization serves to justify the violence and exploitation that white settlers inflicted upon the Indigenous people. By removing the personhood from the Indigenous people, it makes the killing, stealing, and other atrocities less morally reprehensible.      It seemed t...
Read more